4. Comparison table: Pre-action discovery, non-party discovery and Norwich Pharmacal order
| Route | When used | Against whom | Main purpose | Key limit |
| Pre-action discovery | Before proceedings | Often before proceedings | To obtain directly relevant documents before deciding or formulating a claim | Documents must be directly relevant. Not for fishing. Applicant must show necessity, sufficient identification of documents/classes, possession, custody or power, and likely future proceedings. |
Non-party discovery | After proceedings have begun | A non-party | To obtain relevant documents needed in existing proceedings | The broader Peruvian Guano test applies, but the order must still be necessary for fair disposal or saving costs. Request must be proportionate, focused, not oppressive, and subject to privilege/confidentiality safeguards. |
Norwich Pharmacal order | Often before proceedings | A person mixed up in wrongdoing, often innocently | To identify a wrongdoer or obtain information needed to bring a claim | Exceptional equitable remedy. Not a general investigative tool. Court balances necessity, proportionality, confidentiality, privacy, privilege and costs. Applicant usually pays reasonable compliance costs. |



Print
Email
